Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jack Bear's avatar

I like a lot of your suggestions. But how much of the problem is a change in attitude of the owners? I see this across all the sports leagues. So many owners view their franchise as money making machines. They decided the best way to do that is to cut costs, usually by refusing to pay good players, and riding TV deals. How many MLB front offices are actually trying to win a world series?

Expand full comment
Eric Blair's avatar

Very nice article. I like almost all of your suggestions. Do you really need wild card teams though? Baseball was pretty compelling when two divisions winners went straight to the LCS. 162 games should be enough to prove whether or not you belong there. The last year that format was used (1993), the Giants lost on the last day of the season and missed the playoffs despite winning 105 games. That last week in the NL West was as good as a playoff series. And the World Series winner tended to be the best team in baseball; now it's usually whatever above-average team is playing on a hot streak in October.

Consolidated divisions would revive some broken rivalries. The Phillies and Pirates had classic battles for the NL East throughout the 1970s and 1980s and now they're just teams that play each other six times a year or so. Other regions probably have similar stories.

Despite my traditionalist inclinations, though, I need to say that I LOVE the pace of games after the pitch clock reforms.

Expand full comment
12 more comments...

No posts